Employee benefit plan audits require specific tests. Since plan sponsors are ultimately responsible for the audit, be sure that you get what you need to remain in compliance. Here are seven questions to confirm with your auditor that will keep you covered as long as the answers meet compliance standards:

1. Have the plan assets been fairly valued? What is the standard used to value the assets?
2. Are plan obligations properly stated and described?
3. Are contributions to the plan received in a timely manner?
4. Are benefit payments made in accordance with the plan terms?
5. Are participant accounts fairly stated?
6. Are there any issues with the plan that may impact the plan’s tax status?
7. Are there any identified transactions that are prohibited under ERISA?

Answers to the questions above will provide a dialogue with your auditor from which you can form a plan to make necessary corrections. Hiring an auditor with specific employee benefit plan experience makes it easier to prioritize the adjustments.  Your plan participants need the assurance that their benefit plan meets ERISA standards.

The formal name for setting auditor expectations is ‘written representations.’ Without a document of representations, the auditor is limited in his or her ability to provide a thorough opinion of the plan. The plan managers who are responsible for financial statements need to prepare a complete document for the auditor that includes the following:

-         Financial records and related transaction information

-         Minutes of meetings related to the plan such as plan committees, trustees or directors

-         Communications from regulatory agencies

In addition, the document must also include the following eight disclosures:

1. Acknowledgement of the fair representation of the financial statements of net assets available for plan benefits and  statement of benefit obligations
2. Statement that any uncorrected misstatements are immaterial to the financial statements as a whole
3. Internal control responsibility and procedures to prevent and detect fraud
4. Knowledge of any suspected fraud by management, employees former employees, regulators or others
5. Knowledge of violations or possible violations of regulations or unasserted claims
6. Intentions for the plan that may affect the classification of assets or liabilities
7. Verbal or written guarantees or gain/loss contingencies that affect the plan’s liabilities
8. Documentation of assets that are pledged as collateral

Your auditor will also want to know answers to these five questions: Read the rest of this entry »

401(k) plans require much maintenance to meet fiduciary requirements. There are many mistakes that can creep in over time that put you out of compliance. Here’s a list of potholes that can wreck your plan with the IRS:

-         Not updating your plan to reflect current laws

-         Not operating the plan in accordance with the plan document

-         Incorrect definitions of compensation for deferrals and allocations

-         Lack of consistency with employer matching contributions

-         Failing the 401(k) ADP and ACP nondiscrimination tests

-         Excluding eligible employees

-         Not making timely deposits of employee elective deferrals

-         Incorrectly administering participant loans or hardship distributions

-         Not making required minimum contributions

-         Delaying filing the Form 5500-series return

-         Not distributing a Summary Annual Report to all plan participants

Instead of losing sleep over the problems that come with non-compliance, the IRS provides a simple to understand 401(k) plan fix-it guide. The guide includes how to find, fix and avoid mistakes. Regular review of this list and making note of your compliance actions can save you time and work when it’s time for an audit.

Your 401(k) auditor has two essential and one optional step to take with regard to internal control deficiency findings. Before you hire your auditor, ask what you can expect with regard to communication and recommendations. By including your expectations in your engagement letter, you’ll get a better quality audit and can get information that will help you.

Two essential steps for your auditor

1. Evaluate the severity of deficiencies – Your auditor will determine if an individual or combination of deficiencies are material weaknesses or significant deficiencies. The measure used to determine severity is the:

• Magnitude of the potential misstatement
• Degree of possibility that the plan’s controls will fail to prevent, or detect and correct a misstatement of an account balance or disclosure.

2. Communicate the deficiencies in writing – Your auditor has no more than 60 days following the financial statement issuance date to communicate the deficiencies to you. For plans that file a Form 11-K with the SEC, the deadline is to communicate within 45 days. If no deficiencies are found, the auditor must also communicate a lack of deficiencies.

Note: Auditors are required to put the same deficiencies in writing repeatedly until the deficiency is corrected. And, the deficiencies found must be put in writing even if they were corrected after a verbal notice of the deficiency.

One optional step for your auditor

Recommend steps to take to improve internal controls – To me, this step separates an adequate auditor from a good auditor. Your organization can gain valuable insight from the recommendations prepared by your auditor. The recommendations give you fiduciary guidance that you can use to evaluate the costs and benefits for revising internal controls.

Such focused attention on internal controls gives plan fiduciaries a confirmation of governance, which is justification of a well-managed plan.

One of the most significant points of your benefit plan audit is determining the strength of internal controls with regard to reliable financial reporting. Here is a description of the three types of deficiencies that you want to avoid:

1. Material weakness – A deficiency, or combination of deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the entity’s financial statements will not be prevented, or detected and corrected on a timely basis.
2. Significant deficiency – A deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control that is less severe than a material weakness, yet important enough to merit attention by those charged with governance.
3. Deficiencies in internal control – Exists when the design or operation of a control does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct misstatements on a timely basis.

Because internal controls are critical to good fiduciary management, I want to make sure that you have examples of issues that could cause a problem for you. Here are types of circumstances that may be material weaknesses or significant deficiencies: Read the rest of this entry »

Your auditor’s engagement letter details the expectations of the roles of both auditor and plan sponsor. Understand that if the scope of services changes, the engagement letter may need to be updated during the course of the audit. Because an update typically means more work for the accountant, that can translate to paying higher fees. So, it’s better to fully vet the issues before beginning by asking these questions:

1. Can we perform a limited-scope audit, or do we need a full-scope audit to satisfy the DOL?
2. Do we have all of the financial records up to date and easy to locate?
3. Do we need to file a Form 11-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)?
4. Do we have a list of internal controls by which the auditor can assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements?
5. What is the auditor’s responsibility regarding supplemental schedules required by the DOL?
6. Is tax-exempt status an issue? If yes, will the auditor give an opinion regarding the plan’s qualification in that regard?
7. Will the auditor be responsible for information for the Form 5500 and/or Annual Report?
8. How will the auditor communicate ERISA compliance issues found during the audit – verbally or in writing?
9. What is the auditor’s responsibility regarding electronic filings?
10. Have we agreed upon estimated delivery time, fees and billing arrangements?

Asking these questions will set expectations and fulfill your fiduciary responsibility to your plan participants. We recommend keeping a written record of all correspondence and requesting verbal communications to be confirmed in writing.

A determination letter from the IRS gives you the assurance and validity that your plan meets the criteria for contributions to the plan to be tax exempt (non-Roth IRAs). However, if you make any changes to your retirement plan, including amendments, then you need a new determination letter. So, if you made changes to the plan that were due by December 31, make sure that you also take care of these three things:

1. Request a new determination letter. Work with your third party administrator to ask the IRS to review your revised plan document and issue you a favorable determination letter. The plan prototype may already have been deemed acceptable by the IRS and if this is the case make sure that you retain a copy of the letter.

2. Check the letter for consistency with your amendments. If you find an error, fax the letter sent to you with an explanation of the correction needed.

3. Administer the plan to according to the plan document. Failure to follow your plan document can nullify the tax exemption awarded by the IRS’ determination letter.

To request corrections for errors or to get a copy of your current determination letter, send your request via fax to 513-263-4330 and include:

-         Plan sponsor’s name, EIN and phone number

-         Plan name and number

-         Year that the letter was issued

-         Fax number to send the copy of the determination letter

If you prefer to mail your request, send to: Attn: Manager, EP Correspondence, IRS, P.O. Box 2508, Room 5-120, Cincinnati, OH 45201

For more information, see a list of FAQs about determination letters.

This year, when you make New Year’s resolutions, be sure to have one about checking on the fees you pay to administer your plan. Even a company like Walmart, with its extensive legal resources, recently agreed to pay $13.5 million dollars along with Merrill Lynch for a class action settlement. Without admitting any fiduciary wrongdoing, they agreed to eliminate funds from their plans that carried high fees. A few reminders:

1. Know what fees you pay and be prepared to justify them to your plan participants as well as the DOL.
2. Be sure that record-keeping fees are documented separately from investment management fees.
3. Diversify your plan portfolio, offering choices to plan participants.
4. Communicate all changes to your plan participants and employees – clearly and promptly to avoid any misunderstandings.

Your plan auditor is a good source of information about ways to keep your plan in top fiduciary shape. Another good resource is the AICPA’s Accounting and Auditing Resource Centers.

Once you make an amendment to your plan, how and when you communicate with plan participants is an important ERISA requirement. A case this fall, Helton v. ATT, Inc. (Sept. 16, 2011), points to four important lessons in communication:

1. Answer plan participant questions in a timely and concrete manner

Your communication with plan participants is best put in writing whenever possible. Documenting answers to questions that come from plan participants about their
specific situation keeps everyone on the same page.

2. Prepare and distribute a Summary of Material Modifications (SMM) or Summary Plan Description (SPD)

You technically have 210 days after the plan year in which the changes are adopted to communicate changes. However, you’re better off preparing and distributing
materials as soon as possible to make sure that those affected by the changes can act accordingly. And, the task is complete – it won’t be overlooked with the passing of time.

3. Keep records of how and to whom SMM or SPD notices were sent.

If it’s possible for plan participants to somehow miss a piece of communication about plan changes, you need documentation to prove that the proper notice was sent in the time required by ERISA. Documentation may be as simple as a mailing list of recipients.

4. Remember that all plan participants and surviving beneficiaries need a notice, not just current employees.

This communication tip may seem obvious, but unfortunately, it’s not always followed.

See if any of the following action items apply to your retirement plan and take action prior to December 31, 2011:

1. Make discretionary amendments for plan design changes

Whether a defined benefit (DB) or defined contribution (DC) plan, any plan design changes that you want to be effective for the 2012 plan year need to be adopted by the
end of 2011. Examples of amendments include changes to automatic enrollment or matching amounts.

2. Complete in-plan Roth conversions

Earlier this year, I wrote about in-plan conversions to Roth accounts, part 1 & part 2. If you have an employee who wants to split the conversion amount between 2011
and 2012, be sure that proper documentation is executed prior to December 31, 2011.

3. Amend DC plan documentation if you suspended 2009 required minimum distributions

The Worker, Retiree and Employer Recovery Act (WRERA) of 2008 allowed DC plans to treat 2009 required minimum distributions (RMDs) as eligible rollover distributions. Make sure that your plan document is amended to reflect the 2009 RMD rollovers if you took advantage of this provision. (You were able to defer documentation until now.)